It’s ridiculous. It takes weeks to count a few hundred thousand ballots—absolutely ridiculous. We’re now accustomed to waiting beyond Election Day to learn the results. The only plausible reason for this delay is that someone is manipulating the election. Face it—we know this to be true.

What we share with you now is 100% certain: elections are being stolen from top to bottom. It began with the Trump and Kamala race, which was too big for them to completely steal. However, they still tried, and the effects of their efforts are evident across every single partisan race, including ballot initiatives. For example, while they failed to flip the ranked-choice voting question, they successfully flipped the abortion bill, allowing for late-term abortion up to nine months.

We will provide a full report within one week, but this abbreviated report is irrefutable and proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that the elections in Nevada were stolen. Share this with your best and brightest—there’s $80,000 on the line for anyone who can prove otherwise.

We believe there will be at least one election contest, if not more, and using the evidence provided, it will be impossible for them to lose if the judge simply follows the rule of law.

Spread this far and wide. Do not remain silent.

Here are some highlights of the report in easy to understand format for the layman.

Top 10 Findings Suggesting Election Manipulation

1. Republican “No” Votes on Ranked-Choice Voting Dropped Unexplainably

• What happened: In early voting, 80% of Republicans voted “No” on Ranked-Choice Voting, but on Election Day, this number dropped to 55%.

• Why it matters: Such a drastic shift, without any clear explanation, strongly suggests tampering with Election Day votes.

2. Late-Term Abortion Proposal Saw Suspicious Vote Flipping

• What happened: Republicans initially opposed the late-term abortion proposal 2:1 in early voting, but on Election Day, this resistance suddenly weakened to a 1:1 split. Meanwhile, Democrat resistance to the measure mysteriously doubled.

• Why it matters: The consistent and opposing shifts for both parties indicate deliberate manipulation to push the measure through.

3. Flipping of Votes Detected

• What happened: About 4,670 Republican “No” votes and 2,202 Democrat “No” votes on Ranked-Choice Voting were flipped to “Yes.” Similarly, thousands of votes flipped in favor of the late-term abortion measure.

• Why it matters: These vote flips are mathematically too precise to be random and suggest intentional tampering.

4. Vote Patterns Matched an Algorithm, Not Human Behavior

• What happened: The percentages of “Yes” and “No” votes for both parties followed exact mathematical patterns.

• Why it matters: Natural voting behavior is messy and inconsistent, not algorithmically perfect. This points to artificial interference.

5. Changes Were Bipartisan but Targeted

• What happened: Votes were manipulated for both parties, but Republicans were affected more significantly, particularly on measures like Ranked-Choice Voting and late-term abortion, where they had larger opposing majorities.

• Why it matters: This shows deliberate targeting of the party with the most resistance to key ballot measures.

6. Mathematical Formula Predicted Results Perfectly

• What happened: A mathematical equation could predict voting results across precincts with 99.4% accuracy—something impossible in a fair election.

• Why it matters: Such precision suggests pre-determined outcomes, not genuine voter decisions.

7. Sudden Uniformity Across Precincts

• What happened: Voting patterns for both Trump and Kamala supporters were unnaturally consistent across precincts, regardless of location or demographics.

• Why it matters: Such uniformity is highly unusual and points to centralized manipulation of vote totals.

8. Early and Election Day Votes Behaved Differently

• What happened: Early votes showed clear patterns, but Election Day votes suddenly shifted, particularly on controversial issues like Ranked-Choice Voting and late-term abortion.

• Why it matters: These inconsistencies suggest tampering occurred after early voting data became available.

9. Algorithms Targeted “Hard-to-Spot” Metrics

• What happened: Manipulation focused on obscure vote ratios and metrics that wouldn’t be easily noticed by regular audits.

• Why it matters: This shows a calculated effort to avoid detection while altering election outcomes.

10. Same Patterns Seen in Other Elections

• What happened: Similar anomalies were identified in past elections (e.g., 2020 and 2022 in Nevada), using the same voting systems and manipulation techniques.

• Why it matters: This isn’t an isolated incident but part of a recurring pattern of election tampering.

Simplified Takeaway

The evidence shows unusual shifts in voting behavior, particularly around Ranked-Choice Voting and late-term abortion, that cannot be explained by normal voter actions. These shifts align too perfectly with mathematical models, suggesting votes were manipulated using algorithms. This interference undermines the legitimacy of the election results and warrants immediate investigation.

Longer Version (if you don’t see it, refresh the page, or click here):
*Note to readers, large file not fully completed yet*

Loading...

Taking too long?

Reload document

| Open in new tab

Download [15.71 MB]